Supreme Court agrees to review long standing home distilling ban
The United States Supreme Court agreed to hear a legal challenge to a federal law prohibiting the distilling of alcohol in private homes.
FTMQ News, written by our newsroom0 views

The United States Supreme Court agreed on Monday to consider whether Congress has the constitutional authority to ban home distilling of spirits. The New York Post and the Washington Examiner both report that the high court took up the case to decide if lawmakers overstepped federal powers. [1][3]
The Washington Examiner reports that an orders list released on Monday morning confirmed the high court will hear Department of Justice v. Scott McNutt. Oral arguments are expected later this term. [3]
The New York Post reports that the challenged federal law dates back to 1868 during the Reconstruction era. Plaintiffs claim the statute is an outdated rule passed as part of a tax reform measure to stop fraud by commercial distillers. Government attorneys argue that Congress properly restricted distilling locations to prevent producers from evading taxes. [1]
The Supreme Court of the United States holds ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all federal court cases and state cases concerning constitutional issues. The high court asserted its power of judicial review in 1803, enabling it to invalidate statutes that violate the Constitution. [13]
The court will decide whether to strike down the long standing prohibition, which the Washington Examiner notes could invalidate rules established over a century ago. [3]
In short
- The Supreme Court agreed on Monday to review an 1868 federal ban on home distilling of spirits.
- The legal challenge is filed as Department of Justice v. Scott McNutt.
- Plaintiffs argue Congress overstepped its constitutional taxation powers when enacting the ban.
Sources
Every paragraph above points to the numbered items it rests on. Read the originals here.
- [1]Supreme Court agrees to review a Reconstruction-era ban on distilling spirits in private homesNew York Post, 1h ago (the report this story comes from)
- [2]Supreme Court won't review Trump's firing of labor board memberCNBC, 3h ago
- [3]Supreme Court takes up challenge to 160-year-old ban on distilling alcohol at homewashingtonexaminer.com, 3h ago
- [4]Can you make whiskey at home? The Supreme Court will decideCNN, 3h ago
- [5]Accused gangster challenging his deportation from Türkiye in Supreme CourtABC News Australia, 15h ago
- [6]Supreme Court to hear case challenging Montgomery County’s selective school admissions policyWashington Times, 4h ago
- [7]Fire engulfs Albania’s Supreme Court as protests enter fifth dayAl Jazeera, 21h ago
- [8]Supreme Court agrees to review a Reconstruction-era ban on distilling spirits in private homesAP News, 4h ago
- [9]Supreme Court agrees to review a Reconstruction-era ban on distilling spirits in private homesWOWK 13 News, 4h ago
- [10]Supreme Court agrees to review Reconstruction-era ban on distilling spirits in private homesWKMG, 4h ago
- [11]Supreme Court agrees to review Reconstruction-era ban on distilling spirits in private homesWPLG Local 10, 4h ago
- [12]Supreme Court agrees to review a Reconstruction-era ban on distilling spirits in private homesGoshen News, 3h ago
Background
- [13]Supreme Court of the United States on Wikipedia
- [14]Prohibition in the United States on Wikipedia
- [15]MPs call for civil servant to avoid private ADHD clinic review FTMQ News, 4d ago
- [16]Supreme Court justices criticize criminal prosecution of Mexican immigrant FTMQ News, 5d ago
Our newsroom writes these reports with the help of software, from the 16 sources listed and nothing else, and checks them against those sources. Facts can still be wrong or move on; the originals are the record. Spotted a mistake? Write to daniel@monsterkong.com.
Related from FTMQ News
Earlier reports of ours on the same people and subjects.
- Department of Justice sues Denver over federal officer mask banTop Stories, 10d ago
- CVS agrees to 315 million dollar settlement over opioid prescriptionsTop Stories, 5d ago
- US Supreme Court to hear case on online video trackingTop Stories, 5d ago
- Appeals court questions Trump challenge to Presidential Records ActTop Stories, 2d ago
- United States drops prosecution of former CIA analyst Sue Mi TerryTop Stories, 5d ago
More in Top Stories
- Tommy Robinson trial hears he used bully boy tactics against journalists15m ago
- South Carolina man wins 500000 dollars from scratch off lottery ticket15m ago
- Max Factor heir Andrew Luster released on parole from prison15m ago
- Gut bacteria cocktail could signal early dementia signs study finds35m ago
- Mayor Mamdani declines to commit to extra subway police after shooting54m ago
- Scott Boland puts Australia in command against South Africa in second Test55m ago
Get the day in one email
Reports like this one, the top news of the last 24 hours, every morning. Free, one email a day; readers can comment under every report.
By signing up you agree to our terms and privacy policy. Unsubscribe any time.


Comments
Loading
Join the conversation
Comments are open to readers of our daily email: the top news of the last 24 hours, every morning, free. Sign up and the comment box opens.
Already on the list? Enter the same address and we will send a sign-in link.
By signing up you agree to our terms and privacy policy. Unsubscribe any time.